 dkjones96 Sweet! 04-08-2009, 08:06 AM
|
04-08-2009, 02:56 AM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,139
|
Tried driving according to my algorithm and I quickly noticed an area of ambiguity: coasting down shallow hills. As long as the hill is steep enough to keep the speed above the level cruising speed (between 50-55 mph) then it's fine, but what if speed drops below that? Right now the algorithm would add the small amount of power needed to maintain the level cruising speed down the hill. Is the best course of action to coast down all the way to the minimum allowable speed and then go back into powered mode? That approach seems to fit in with pulse and glide methodology better and it's what I'm doing right now when I drive manually: milk the decline for all it's worth. Hill detection would be easy just by examining the speed vs throttle position history data.
Also, thought over a simplified form of pulse and glide that doesn't require GPS to automate. Seems like you'd just carry out a normal pulse and glide routine, interrupting pulses if you encountered an uphill stretch. Does that make sense to those of you familiar with it? If so, I can boil that down to another pseudo code description. Thanks a lot.
__________________
Main Entry: co de pen dence - see codependency
co de pen den cy
Pronunciation: \kō-di-ˈpen-dən(t)-sē\
Function: noun
Date: 1979
: a psychological condition or a relationship in which a person is controlled or manipulated by another who is affected with a pathological condition (as an addiction to alcohol or heroin) ; broadly : dependence on the needs of or control by another
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|