snow tires -- right size? - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 11-28-2008, 05:01 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
1993CivicVX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,066
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to 1993CivicVX
snow tires -- right size?

Hi, I am looking at possibly getting studded snow tires for my Civic VX and need some input on the size. My car calls for 165/70R/13 and I currently have 175/70R/13 on my car. The ones for sale are 155/80R/13. Will these fit? The guy said they'd add an inch of height. Do you agree? Input appreciated!

Also, are studded snows not ideal for highway driving? I often travel 75 miles each way on the highway. Thanks! They're very cheap, $20 for 1 season used studded snow tires. Thanks.
__________________

__________________
three stripes the charm!

Car mods are overrated. Just gotta adjust that nut behind the wheel for best mpg.



Forget about World Peace...Visualize using your turn signal.
1993CivicVX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 05:27 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 244
Country: United States
The 165/70 has a 69.41" circumference. The 155/80 has a 71.51" circumference and will cause your odometer to read 3% fewer miles than the 165/70 tire, but only 0.5% fewer miles than the 175/70 tire. That said, each manufacturer's tire may have a slightly larger or smaller circumference than the purported correct circumference of any given size tire. Tire inflation will also affect the cirumference slightly.
__________________

__________________
cems70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 05:29 PM   #3
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
See the tire size calculator linked in my sig. It will give you everything you need.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 05:32 PM   #4
Registered Member
 
1993CivicVX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,066
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to 1993CivicVX
Thanks guys. I forgot about the tire calculator before I posted this and then remembered immediately found it upon searching this site. So the size is very similar to what I have on there now! Although I'm still a little unclear what the first number measures on the tire. (155 vs 175)
Thanks.
__________________
three stripes the charm!

Car mods are overrated. Just gotta adjust that nut behind the wheel for best mpg.



Forget about World Peace...Visualize using your turn signal.
1993CivicVX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 05:37 PM   #5
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
First number measures tread width in millimeters. That part makes reasonable sense.

Second number measures sidewall height as a percentage of tread width, which is a choice obviously made by someone who was very drunk.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2008, 09:00 PM   #6
Registered Member
 
1993CivicVX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,066
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to 1993CivicVX
so the sidewall heights of my current tires and the snow tires are nearly the same, which is what I was concerned about. Thanks animal of India.
__________________
three stripes the charm!

Car mods are overrated. Just gotta adjust that nut behind the wheel for best mpg.



Forget about World Peace...Visualize using your turn signal.
1993CivicVX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 09:16 AM   #7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 557
Country: United States
The 155 will make a better snow tire than the same brand/model in 165 or 175. Narrower tires will penetrate down through the snow covered roads better than a wider tire. A narrow tire pressing down through the snow onto pavement will have better traction than a wide one pressing down on but supported by snow.
When the roads are clear, both tires will have rubber on the road and the wider one will have better lateral grip.
Lug_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 07:59 AM   #8
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_TomO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,108
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to GasSavers_TomO Send a message via MSN to GasSavers_TomO Send a message via Yahoo to GasSavers_TomO
I used to run 155/80/13 Winterforce snow tires on my hondas, non-studded (also illegal in MN). They were awesome, lasted 5 seasons. Now I'm just running Goodyear 155/80/13 all seasons and they are working well. not as grippy as the winterforce tires, but good enough for me to get around with. I'm running 175/60/13 in the back and wouldn't want them on the front of my VX as I would end up losing some traction. I tried it one day and immediately switched back toe the 155s.
__________________

Honda Civic VX Info/Links
Remember to use good Webiquette!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ezeedee View Post
controversy is an idea thought up by weak people who are too afraid to hear the truth.
GasSavers_TomO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 12:38 PM   #9
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 113
Country: United States
The smaller aero drag for the same diameter may help compensate for the added drag from the studs.

Make sure the width is compatible with your rims.

Sticky tires will wear down quickly.
__________________
GasSavers_Bruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 02:40 PM   #10
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,256
Country: United States
Location: wiliamsburg virigina
I use the mile markers on the Interstate here to check my odometer calibration. The Michelin 175-70-13's I have on my VX now are exactly 1% low on odometer reading, 99 miles indicated to 100 miles travelled.

Sadly they cost me about 10% mileage, compared to the original Bridgestones ;(.

regards
gary
__________________

__________________
R.I.D.E. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Feature: Loan and lease cost labrie Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 02-08-2012 02:12 AM
Basic Stats poorboymeyer Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 09-22-2009 09:19 AM
Performance Underdrive Pulleys? cfg83 General Maintenance and Repair 10 09-08-2007 09:04 PM
first oficial meet (since svoboy failed :P) GasSavers_Diemaster General Fuel Topics 2 04-14-2006 09:56 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.