EPA figures for a 96 Camry - Fuelly Forums
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-08-2011, 08:01 AM   #1
Registered Member
goofy1's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 169
Country: United States
EPA figures for a 96 Camry


This seems to be backwards. According to the EPA, a V6 auto is getting slightly higher MPG compared to the 4cyl auto. I had a 93 V6 Camry and the highest I got with that car was 28mpg. But my mother had a 96 Camry 4cyl and i got 34mpg no problem. Both were driven the same way and using the same hypermiling tricks. Full tank,tires, etcs. Is this just another goverment goof up or am I missing something?

"But Doc, we dont' have enough road to get it up to 88 miles per hour"
goofy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2011, 08:31 AM   #2
Site Team / Moderator
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,602
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
Re: EPA figures for a 96 Camry

Just goes to show that real world application and laboratory testing can yield different results.

In the 80's it was common for vehicles with bigger engines to be rated better. A Chrysler minivan with a V-6 was rated better than the same van with a 2.2L 4 cylinder.


Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2011, 10:39 PM   #3
Registered Member
imzjustplayin's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 720
Country: United States
Re: EPA figures for a 96 Camry

If you bring a 2007 camry into the mix when doing the comparison, you can see the "old, 1985 EPA numbers". This is useful because now you can see with more precision the fuel economy numbers these cars get and you can see now that the '96 V6 does 2mpg better on the hwy 1mpg worse in the city compared to the '96 I4. The '93 camrys and corollas do worse on the fuel economy tests than their '96+ bretheren, for whatever reason.. In fact, the pre OBD-II Corollas and Camrys have worse fuel economy but more power than their OBD-II counterparts.

How well the car is tuned up and condition it is in can be a factor in fuel economy. As for why a V6 does better on the highway but worse in the city, transmission gearing helps it on the highway but the displacement hurts it in the city. V6 engine could also be of a newer generation compared to the I4 being used.

edit: yup, if you look on wikipedia, the 1MZ engine (V6) first started production in 1994 and is introduced for the 1994 model year while the S engine (I4) was first introduced in 1982 and the 5S-FE used in the Camry is just a later revision... The later camrys get better fuel economy with the I4 compared to the V6 versions, as expected.. Technology trumps displacement! Surprise surprise!
imzjustplayin is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help...MPG calculator not working djquik1 Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 10-18-2010 04:57 AM
fuel-up entry suggestion fugalaya Fuelly Web Support and Community News 3 04-12-2009 08:29 AM
"Real World" Fuel Economy vs. EPA Estimates Matt Timion Automotive News, Articles and Products 6 06-02-2008 10:23 AM
The state of commuting in America theclencher General Fuel Topics 32 10-21-2006 06:21 PM
Greetings from Japan. GasSavers_Diemaster General Discussion (Off-Topic) 8 07-13-2006 06:56 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.