Anyone experiment with spring heights to change aero? - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums
Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > Aerodynamics
Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-24-2007, 05:18 PM   #11
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 49
Country: United States
Originally Posted by thisisntjared View Post
also where the shock mounts to the control arm is not a good place to measure ground clearance because it is unsprung. i would measure the lowest part of the sprung chasis to the ground. this would probably some cross member or something.
i have a solid axle in the rear, so ground clearance doesnt change until i air down the tires and the sidewalls get some noticeable flex.

ezeedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 06:20 PM   #12
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 313
Country: United States
or the differential in ezeedee's case

- a range rover would make it simple to test if it has manual control for fr/rr ht
- dunno if it does

2TonJellyBean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 05:16 PM   #13
thisisntjared's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to thisisntjared
hmm i didnt think of the rear axle as the point of measuring ground clearance.... i dont know what the standard is, but i wouldnt count it. if you do then a lift kit will not get you more ground clearance, only larger tires would.
don't waste your time or time will waste you
thisisntjared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 05:23 PM   #14
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 313
Country: United States
sorry, that's just the way the industry measures it... lowest point

people looking into lift kits will see a change in the angle of approach/departure and breakover
2TonJellyBean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2007, 11:44 AM   #15
Registered Member
oneinchsidehop's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 165
Country: United States
Yep. Hot Rod Magazine

Good article in parts. the gist of it: dropping the car is good for about a .01 improvement for every inch dropped. (I've heard that number a lot)

Dropping the front keeps air out and gives it a large space to expand: lower drag and squirrelly rear end.

Dropping the rear increases the venturi effect under the car (duh) so any belly pans become more valuable. Also creates (a lot) of lift in the front end. AKA suicide at speed. That would include 65mph with a gust of 50mph headwind.

Springs and ride hight effect the air under the car so much more than the air above that the changes in roof plane become almost unmeasurable.

Dropping works.
Air Dams work. if they're done right.
trunk extentions work
shaving works
chopping/channeling/sectioning works big time (reduction in frontal area)

Seems to make sense to me.

Oh, and no one at Bonneville (in the classes that allow it) run boat tails it seems. I wonder why? they do kamm backs though.

"If you want to save gas I suggest you permanently remove the drivers seat and steering wheel. That seems to help." -Oscar Halverson

oneinchsidehop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2007, 01:18 PM   #16
Registered Member
theclencher's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 542
Country: United States
1L doesn't have boattail either.

Old EPA 23/33/27
New EPA 21/30/24

New EPA12/14/17

theclencher is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
elg's Project zpiloto General Fuel Topics 2 03-03-2007 06:47 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.