MB GL400 vs. GL400 Coupe - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 11-26-2015, 02:55 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 12
Country: Australia
Location: Brisbane
MB GL400 vs. GL400 Coupe

MB have released their new 2016 GL class SUV in traditional wagon and 4-door Coupe versions.

What I found interesting was the two different rooflines. So I looked up the fuel consumption figures for both models in the GL400 class (twin turbo V6 gasoline engine with auto and AWD).

So MB has quoted the 'slippery' Coupe as only 0.1lt per 100km better on the combined cycle. I know the difference would be noticed more at highway speeds, but I couldn't find a highway only figure for the upcoming Coupe version.

Would have thought the better aero shape of the Coupe might have yielded a bigger difference even in the combined cycle??

Still, at 8.8lt (Wagon) vs. 8.7lt (Coupe) per 100km its hardly a thirsty SUV. Albeit, claimed manufacturers figures ;-)
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	03-Mercedes-Benz-GLE-class-Facelift-660x602.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	206.3 KB
ID:	1892   Click image for larger version

Name:	03-GLE-Coupe-Mercedes-Benz-660x602-EN.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	217.7 KB
ID:	1893  
__________________

boof777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2015, 03:00 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,486
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Mid Wales
No doubt those tests took place on a rolling road in a laboratory, sadly they can only estimate and calculate other factors like weather/wind resistance etc in such conditions. No doubt in real life, a more aerodynamic shape will have a bigger impact on fuel efficiency, having said that, the vehicle in question is a large SUV, it's high up so it's aero drag is higher than a normal car.
__________________

__________________

Please subscribe to my YouTube channel
Draigflag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2015, 04:57 PM   #3
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 12
Country: Australia
Location: Brisbane
I'm just glad they are actually looking at SUVs these days with regards to more efficient aero.

I've noticed a lot of new SUV type vehicles with a small partial kammback type 'spoilers' on the roof.

I don't see many of these MBs leaving the pavement though ;-)

Unfortunately I'm stuck with the old gen box lol. Still, its worth keeping and trying to improve it. Maintaining its off road abilities is the tricky part for me.
boof777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2015, 07:24 AM   #4
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,461
Country: United States
Location: north east PA
Yeah, the specifics of the official test will affect if their is any official difference. Most of those tests likely don't reach a speed high enough for such minor aero differences to be seen. That coupe also needs a belly pan and grill shutters to get a better improvement over the SUV.

Does Australia have their own test protocols, or do they basically just use someone elses(Japan, US, or EU) test methods or results?
trollbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 01:56 PM   #5
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 12
Country: Australia
Location: Brisbane
Not sure what Australia do exactly. We do have our own ANCAP testing for new cars but not sure if we test them locally for fuel consumption etc etc apart from journalist reviews.

BMW have a really nice grill block setup in their cars. Shutters open and close depending on the engine and/or underbonnet temp. I will look at this setup on my rolling cinder block as well.
boof777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 02:50 PM   #6
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,486
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Mid Wales
A lot of manufactures are now focusing on aerodynamics and weight stripping. Up until now, all the development has been in engine technology, but manufacturers are beginning to realise that the lab tests they do for fuel consumption, aerodrag etc can only be estimated, and having a nice fuel efficient engine can be ruined by sloppy aerodynamics or unnecessary weight! We can learn so much from the Motorsport industry
__________________

Please subscribe to my YouTube channel
Draigflag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2015, 02:54 PM   #7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,461
Country: United States
Location: north east PA
Active shutters are starting to show up on many cars. I think the Focus and Cruze fuel efficiency trims had it 5 years ago or so.
__________________

trollbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.