Not so Smart aerodynamic fairing - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > Aerodynamics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-28-2007, 04:36 AM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 24
Not so Smart aerodynamic fairing

Am I the pessimist here ? While most seem to have good results in modifying the aerodynamics of their cars, my experiments show no or little improvement ! I did three modifications :

1- Grille block with a polyethylen film covering tightly the two grille openings and bumper. Only one pass B.

2- Smooth cover hubcaps made with coroplast at the rear and light cone shaped cardboard at the front. AABB.

3- Front skirt, made of a flat piece of 1/8" veneer and 4" lawn edging, from the bumper down 2" to the ground. Covering the lower grille. One passB

The experimental road is a fast downhill 1 km section coming to a flat section for a total of 2,4 km to a stop sign. There is a slight up portion 10 meters from the stop. I had to turn left at the stop sign for a few hundreds feet. You can see it on GPS map:

Starting point: N47.14277? W70.26101? Elevation: 132 meters.
Stop sign : N47.15844? W70.28457? Elevation : 42 meters.

The test were all done as follow: From a standstill at the top, engine off, accelerating downhill without power ( gravity only), and measuring the MAX speed and the distance before the car stops.

Wind : Strong side wind (90?), and then a head wind after the stop sign.

Acuracy: Rounded up to the whole number ( no decimals), which is about 1% variation on 100 km/h. Speed taken on Scangage and GPS. Distance on the GPS but rounded to 25 feet. These experiments were not intended for scientific acuracy but for gross evidence of + 1%. I didn't want to write down acurate numbers to the hundred'th (0.00) because of the wind factor which is not constant.

Results :

The pass A ( without modifications) ( 3 times) was executed at 99 kmh avg. and for all 3 ( so no noticeable standard deviation) and distance = stop sign + 300 feet. So:

0- Stock car: 99 kmh max speed and distance = stop sign + 300 feet.

1- Grille block : 101 kmh max speed and distance = stop sign + 400 feet.
2- Smooth hubcaps: 100 kmh max and distance = stop sign + 400 feet.
3- Front skirt : 97 kmh max and distance = stop sign + 0 foot.

Conclusion: The gross measure give about 1% increase for the first two tests and a decrease of 2% for the last one.
The skirt test surprised me a lot. It might be because the skirt was flat and the stock car is rounded at the front. The undercarriage is also covered with plastic except the engine compartment.

What do you think ???
GasSavers_Antoine is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why doesnt my car show up under 'browse vehicles'? frederic73 Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 06-17-2011 03:00 AM
Tire sizing odometer modifier? BDC Fuelly Web Support and Community News 10 07-25-2009 08:59 PM
iPhone interface - I missed a fuel up check box is distorted funkd00bi3st Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 08-13-2008 09:19 AM
civic ef passenger mirror block off (think aero yo) higguns For Sale 3 02-12-2007 01:46 PM
Conversions zpiloto Fuelly Web Support and Community News 3 11-01-2006 10:42 PM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.