Another GM brand bites the dust (next week) - Page 3 - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 04-30-2009, 11:16 AM   #21
Registered Member
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,873
Country: United States
Location: orlando, florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik View Post
Circa 7 years ago some GM (Pontiac Bonneville V-6) and Ford (Mustang GT V-8) engines had issues with coolant leaks from the coolant ports of their plastic intake manifolds (the plastic would flex and leak coolant into the engine or externally. The GM mechanic admitted that the OEM intakes were only good for about 70K miles (My dad replaced it twice after it leaked in the same spot both times at about 70K miles each time).
this problem w/ the GM V6s most certainly cost them dearly in reliability rating. i believe w/out that issue, they would be on par w/ toyota and honda. i've had several and they are absolutely fantastic except for the intake issue.

if only they made their entire line of vehicles this way they might not ever have needed a bailout...
__________________

bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2009, 11:47 AM   #22
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,657
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
I assume you're talking about the 3.8 V-6, it seems GM has been putting that in everything for the past 20 years. The engine did take some evolutions to become the engine it is today. I remember on my Buick I used to have oil pressure problems. New oil pump, and still had pressure problems. When I was replacing the engine I researched various upgrades to the engine. I found that the oil pump was redesigned for the 1987 Grand National. So when I had ordered a new engine for the car I specified that I wanted the 1987 oil pump put in the car. Haven't had any pressure problems since.

-Jay
__________________

__________________






Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2009, 12:45 PM   #23
Registered Member
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,873
Country: United States
Location: orlando, florida
yes, but the others as well--3.1, 3.4, 3.5, even the 4.3 in monte carlos and their small trucks/SUVs was great. it has been a while since i drove a 2.8, and i've never driven a 3.3 (other than a short test drive).

you could be correct that the 3.8 had the most issues concerning the intake however.
__________________

bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is the FE sweet spot for... bowtieguy Transmissions and Running Gear 14 09-05-2008 07:18 AM
1990 ford tempo gl problems (need advice asap) od_satan General Maintenance and Repair 4 03-19-2008 07:23 AM
Maximum tire pressure holypaulie General Fuel Topics 13 10-02-2007 08:25 AM
How far do you drive daily? OdieTurbo General Fuel Topics 56 03-31-2007 02:49 AM
belly pan teaser pic lovemysan General Fuel Topics 19 11-14-2006 03:18 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.