Weight reduction - not always good? - Page 5 - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 06-22-2007, 06:36 PM   #41
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 8
Country: United States
So for cars weighing the same positioning the weight just right will yeild longer glides
__________________

97tercel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2007, 06:37 PM   #42
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,138
Country: United States
Ya, baddog, the kind of hills where a little more weight might theoretically help would be hills where you would never hit the brakes on the way down. More weight is a sure loser if you are having to press the brakes going down hills.
__________________

__________________
Bill in Houston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2007, 06:46 PM   #43
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 358
Country: United States
Send a message via MSN to baddog671
Bill, I live in Western Maryland and the "hills" I'm talking about, I drive differently than "declines". Coming down a decline I generally put it in neutral and just coast until I either hit a light,traffic, or speed up becuase Im going to slow.

A hill (a mountain if you will, but these are the Appalachins) I may ride the brakes nearly the entire way down or "pulse" the brakes. Otherwise I would gain way too much speed and loose control of the vehicle. But coming up these hills suck soo much gas since they are so steep.
__________________
baddog671 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2007, 06:49 PM   #44
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 358
Country: United States
Send a message via MSN to baddog671
Edit* I thought you were disagreeing with me so I was defending myself.
__________________
baddog671 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2007, 07:11 PM   #45
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 191
Country: United States
The derby analogy only applies if you are fortunate enough to drive downhill everywhere you go.

I had a girlfriend once that use to jog a circular route around her neighborhood and claimed it was a great workout because it was uphill the entire way :-)
lca13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2007, 07:45 AM   #46
Registered Member
 
Snax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
Country: United States
I know that neighborhood. Here's the house of a friend that lives there:

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	esc-e23.jpg
Views:	186
Size:	35.6 KB
ID:	531  
__________________
LiberalImage.com

I think, therefore I doubt.
Snax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2007, 10:15 AM   #47
Team GasMisers5!
 
landspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 440
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucepick View Post
Yes however with a super light car (or a lighter one) you would give it a smaller engine because that would be sufficient for real world needs. Huge engine in small car (as in sports car) would be very fast but if aiming for FE, you'd be at very low throttle most of the time so you'd be far from the sweet spot.
I was talking about weight reduction without changing the engine - most people on here don't change engines.

However, if you did massive weight reduction, and put in a 2 cylinder tiny engine that worked at the best efficiency, it would be better.
__________________

Team GasMisers5 - #1 for first three rounds of the original GS Fuel Economy Challenge
Miles displaced by e-bike since 1 Jan 2008: 62.6 (0 kWh used)
Hypomiler
landspeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2007, 12:17 PM   #48
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,138
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by lca13 View Post
I had a girlfriend once that use to jog a circular route around her neighborhood and claimed it was a great workout because it was uphill the entire way :-)
She should have just run the other way... :-)
__________________
Bill in Houston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2007, 03:57 PM   #49
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 358
Country: United States
Send a message via MSN to baddog671
Quote:
Originally Posted by landspeed View Post
I was talking about weight reduction without changing the engine - most people on here don't change engines.

However, if you did massive weight reduction, and put in a 2 cylinder tiny engine that worked at the best efficiency, it would be better.
Yugo's had a 2 cyclinder, 1.1 Litre if I remember correctly. They weren't very well designed though and were less powerful than my 1.0 L. Wonder how the FE was though...
__________________
baddog671 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2007, 09:48 PM   #50
Team GasMisers5!
 
landspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 440
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog671 View Post
Yugo's had a 2 cyclinder, 1.1 Litre if I remember correctly. They weren't very well designed though and were less powerful than my 1.0 L. Wonder how the FE was though...
They actually had a 45-horsepower 4-cylinder (Yugo 45A), and they were the butt of many jokes in Europe!. They were basically old-design Fiats (can't remember which one), so were very out-of-date. The economy probably wasn't too bad, but they were carburettor. Other 'recycled' Fiat car companies include Lada, and 'FSO' (a polish car company making the 'Polonez Prima'. This was so rubbish that, after 6 years, the body panels would actually rust through and fall off I remember, 15 years ago, I saw a 1988 one on a paper-round I used to do, with duck-tape along the seams of the wings etc, because they had completely rusted through and were about to fall off.

The Fiat 126 BIS had a 2-cylinder engine, and it was light, and very small (so a low frontal area). Cd wouldn't have been that good but CdA probably was. With some aero work it would probably be unbeatable, especially as an electric car.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_126
__________________

__________________

Team GasMisers5 - #1 for first three rounds of the original GS Fuel Economy Challenge
Miles displaced by e-bike since 1 Jan 2008: 62.6 (0 kWh used)
Hypomiler
landspeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuelly Android App - eehokie Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 07-14-2010 09:59 PM
feature request: updates via text message savraj Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 08-13-2008 01:21 AM
Smart Metering Trend pb Fuelly Web Support and Community News 0 07-27-2008 04:03 AM
Back in the top ten again zpiloto General Fuel Topics 8 11-10-2006 08:06 AM
UK Honda Accord Commercial krousdb General Discussion (Off-Topic) 5 05-01-2006 01:30 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.