Blackfly XFi? - Page 3 - Fuelly Forums

Android Users - Coming Soon! - Migrating from aCar 4.8 to 5.0

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 01-17-2007, 03:28 PM   #21
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
Here's a question: if the cam is going to raise effective compression, would that show up if I did a before & after compression test?
__________________

MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2007, 05:01 PM   #22
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 675
Country: United States
I am not sure if it would or not. I would expect that if the valve's are opening and closing at different timing, relative to what you currently have, it may.

However, I'm not sure. I've only run a modified cam in one car and in that I had put in domed pistons and raised the regular compression up to 12 or 13:1. However I ended up having about 250/1000's shaved off of the head, which was all I they could take off, before I even got to where I could get the ignition to ping. Once I did, it ran like gangbusters, with probably 30% more power and about 20% better fuel economy. However, I never did a compression test on it, after I finally got the darn thing to run.

My personal conclusion was that you start fiddeling with it and you can either make it better or a lot worse. I decided to opt for what something came with from the factory.

In your circumstance it seems to me like a cam switch would be very likely to show a noticable, significant increase in mileage, on top of what you already got from the transmission change.

Do you know if the XFi has different pistons, or anything, from what you have?
__________________

Gary Palmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2007, 05:35 PM   #23
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
Engine wise, differences I know of on the XFi (besides the cam):

- slightly smaller throttle body,
- 2 rings on the pistons (vs. 3 on the regular) for reduced friction,
- and the different ECU.
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2007, 07:01 PM   #24
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
SOHC: Camtastic!

I had to check -- thank goodness it's not a pushrod!

At any rate, I think this test may have some potential for members who are stuck with a powerful engine that have access to less-aggressive cam designs for their application.

I'm excited to see the results. If the redline is the only conern, then that's entirely manageable with or without an ECU. Otherwise, cam swaps are fairly common in the horsepower scene -- but to change it for economy is brilliant.

Any concerns with tuning, or will it be install and go?

Keep us posted and good luck!

RH77
__________________
rh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2007, 02:56 PM   #25
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
The Actual Unit - 6 lobes of fury
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2007, 04:54 PM   #26
Registered Member
 
Peakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 467
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post

I'm itching to get this done, but it'll have to wait until winter retreats a little. It's -22 C / -7 F outside. That's Peakster weather, not Blackfly fixin' weather.
Ha haha! Thanks . By the way, it was only -10*C (14*F) in Regina today and it's going to get above freezing this upcoming week .
Peakster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 06:34 PM   #27
Supporting Member
 
GasSavers_nathan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 53
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaX View Post
You can build a DET CAN for detecting knock...it's always amusing when mechanical solutions are better than electronic.
thanks for posting that DaX. i made one on the weekend and tested it out.
works pretty good, you can hear everything your engine is doing. quite amusing actually.
anyway, i advanced my timing and went for a drive, i could hear ping from moderate to high load, so i pulled over and retarded it a bit, took a while to find the right spot and im not even sure how much ive actually changed it from where i began. anyway thats enough threadjacking for me, sorry MetroMPG
GasSavers_nathan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 06:37 PM   #28
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
No that's OK. You're not threadjacking at all - it's relevant.

Question: how much of a difference did using it make? I mean, could you think the timing was OK to the "unaided" ear, but when you used the det can did you discovered it was actually pinging?
MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 06:56 PM   #29
Supporting Member
 
GasSavers_nathan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 53
Country: United States
nah it actually didnt help me out a whole lot. my car lacks sound deadening and the little bit that it did have (ie carpet.) i removed.
if however you have a car which you cant hear the engine too clearly i can see how it would help. it made it easier to hear the ping but i wouldnt say i needed it. i could however hear other engine sounds which i wouldnt be able to make out without the det-can.
if you have the parts laying around id say go ahead and build it. its worth it in amusement alone
GasSavers_nathan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2007, 07:39 PM   #30
Registered Member
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
That's funny.

I'm a bit of an automotive hypochondriac (immediately assume the worst whenever some new sound appears, or the car doesn't idle like it normally does...), so maybe I'd be better off not hearing the noises that I couldn't otherwise hear.

Here's a serious question though: exactly how bad is pinging? EG: If I have my timing set so that I'm just beneath the ping threshold for 98% of my driving, but it does ping on those rare occasions when I load it up (say on a really steep hill, or to accelerate faster than usual), am I playing with fire? Going to wreck the engine?
__________________

MetroMPG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
engine start / stop button question lunarhighway Experiments, Modifications and DIY 26 09-26-2007 07:58 AM
Demand and FE SVOboy General Discussion (Off-Topic) 1 07-22-2006 02:22 PM
Saturn has died! (at least for now) diamondlarry General Discussion (Off-Topic) 73 07-01-2006 05:27 PM
470mpg motorcycle in real world tests GasSavers_Ryland Automotive News, Articles and Products 2 05-02-2006 07:04 PM
Driving Less Saves Gas kickflipjr General Discussion (Off-Topic) 10 02-09-2006 01:56 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.