MBUSA pulls new 2017 diesels after EPA approval delays - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 05-01-2017, 04:48 PM   #11
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 169
Country: Canada
Location: Oakville, Ontario
Draigflag, I still run my FaceBook account. I do so judiciously.

But I agree with you. When people cite actress/model Jenny McCarthy to support their beliefs on medicine, and they cite politicians to support their beliefs on science, it's abundantly clear that we've descended into an age of superstition and the easy manipulation of tens or hundreds of millions of people.

Simple example: "We're the greatest country in the world!" Do you not realize that means you view everyone else as being beneath you? That you make yourself out to be The Master Race? Have you not watched any documentaries about that scenario, and seen it lead to Bad Things™?

(sigh :-/ )
__________________

__________________

2015 Audi Q5 "Progressiv" + S-Line + Scuba Blue, 3.0L V6 TDI
(Highest fuel economy for all Audi Q5s on Fuelly!)

SteveMak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2017, 05:17 PM   #12
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,627
Country: United States
Location: north east PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveMak View Post
When you look at the real-world numbers for all ICE in cars and SUVs on the road, they indicate VW's diesels are not the worst in terms of real-world emissions (though this runs contrary to the common narrative). However VW's diesel are the worst in terms of offending public sensibilities, in that they were caught using a "cheat device" (as defined by law).

Most of the public formed their opinion based on the opinions they've heard expressed through the media.
VW's diesels could be cleaner(the could is there because I haven't looked at the report in a few years) in Europe, but the EPA's actions are in response to how their cars purposely behaved in the US. Here, they did emit a lot more NOx than the BMW that ran the same routes as they did.

And their emitting more had nothing to do with lab tests not matching real world driving cycles, but everything to do with them designing a system that turned off the emission controls when it didn't detect a lab test being run.

It sucks that the EPA is scrutinizing diesels more, but that isn't their fault. Mercedes diesel fans are losing out because M-B is leaving, but what about the diesels the US didn't get because the car companies couldn't figure out how VW passed emissions and kept performance at the time. Mazda might still be planning on introducing a diesel, but Honda gave up years ago.

GM and BMW both have 2017 diesel models, that aren't large trucks, for sale right now. Getting the EPA certification is not an impossible endeavor.
__________________

trollbait is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.