Truck tires - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > Diesels
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 12-11-2006, 12:05 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 682
Country: United States
Thumbs up Truck tires

I have a choice of replacing my stocks 265-75-R16 tires with 235-85-R16 or 315-75-R16. Heres' the relevant data for BF Goodrich tires

315 68 pounds 601 revolutions per mile 3.42 (effective) axle ratio
265 54 pounds 656 revolutions per mile 3.73 axle ratio
235 47 pounds 654 revolutions per mile 3.72 (effective) axle ratio

The big 315 tires lower the axle ratio, but they will add 56 pounds of rotating mass to the truck; and they increase the frontal area of four tires by about 2 square feet.

The narrow 235 tires lower the axle ratio a fraction (almost no effect); they remove 28 pounds of rotating mass from the truck; and they reduce the frontal area by 1 square foot.

Will the 315's lower axle ratio make up for their added mass and frontal area, or would the 235's tires get better mielage?
__________________

__________________
Capitalism: The cream rises. Socialism: The scum rises.
Sludgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 04:14 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 409
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sludgy
I have a choice of replacing my stocks 265-75-R16 tires with 235-85-R16 or 315-75-R16. Heres' the relevant data for BF Goodrich tires

315 68 pounds 601 revolutions per mile 3.42 (effective) axle ratio
265 54 pounds 656 revolutions per mile 3.73 axle ratio
235 47 pounds 654 revolutions per mile 3.72 (effective) axle ratio

The big 315 tires lower the axle ratio, but they will add 56 pounds of rotating mass to the truck; and they increase the frontal area of four tires by about 2 square feet.

The narrow 235 tires lower the axle ratio a fraction (almost no effect); they remove 28 pounds of rotating mass from the truck; and they reduce the frontal area by 1 square foot.

Will the 315's lower axle ratio make up for their added mass and frontal area, or would the 235's tires get better mielage?
I dunno where you live, but aroudn here the thinner tires will help you cut through the snow/slush and corner better where as the wider tire will help you drive over the soft powder with out sinking in as much.

I'm thinking hte 315's will hurt mileage, they are a rather large amount wider than the 235's this will not only hurt frontal area, but disrupt more of the flow under the vehicle. The higher vehicle will have slightly more drag, not to mention i'm guessing the 315's will have more rolling resistance.
__________________

__________________
red91sit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 05:16 PM   #3
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 513
Country: United States
Send a message via MSN to GasSavers_Red
What kind of BFG do you plan on running?
__________________
GasSavers_Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 04:31 AM   #4
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 682
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red
What kind of BFG do you plan on running?
I was thinking of the BFG All Terrain T/A KO's, but that tread pattern looks noisy, and could add wind resistance. I'm now considering 235/85 16 Michelin snows or all season tires. Michelin has a great reputation for economy, but BFG has a reputation for traction and off road toughness. <stumped>
__________________
Capitalism: The cream rises. Socialism: The scum rises.
Sludgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2006, 06:54 AM   #5
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 682
Country: United States
Never heard of Douglas tires
__________________
Capitalism: The cream rises. Socialism: The scum rises.
Sludgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 05:50 AM   #6
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 682
Country: United States
I'm about to drive 500 miles in a blizzard tonight, so I went out and got new tries for the F350. I replaced the stock Goodrich Long Trail 265/75-R16 with Michelin LTX M/S 235/75-R16. They're skinnier and lighter, but have nearly the same diameter (Michelins are ~0.1 inch taller)

Although driving in snow tonight is not a fair test, in a few weeks I'll be able to see whether there's a mileage improvement.
__________________
Capitalism: The cream rises. Socialism: The scum rises.
Sludgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 09:26 AM   #7
Supporting Member
 
lovemysan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 595
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by theclencher View Post
Speaking of tires, how does the Douglas brand measure up? Did a websearch and mostly found forums, so of course some people swear by them and others swear at them.

I'm thinking: 45,000 mile rating; treadwear, temp, and traction ratings similar to most others... sure they are a cheaper tire but does that make them junk?
I had douglas tires before. There not that bad. Just don't expect a whole lot. I had a set on my sunfire. I did end up with some cupping but the car had 180k on it and the wheel bearings could have needed replacement.
__________________
02 Saturn SL
5 speed
for pics click the link below

https://s75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...emysan/saturn/

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"for best mileage swap in a d15z1"
lovemysan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 05:31 AM   #8
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 682
Country: United States
Narrow tires

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sludgy View Post
I'm about to drive 500 miles in a blizzard tonight, so I went out and got new tries for the F350. I replaced the stock Goodrich Long Trail 265/75-R16 with Michelin LTX M/S 235/75-R16. They're skinnier and lighter, but have nearly the same diameter (Michelins are ~0.1 inch taller)

Although driving in snow tonight is not a fair test, in a few weeks I'll be able to see whether there's a mileage improvement.
I got 18 mpg on the first tank after installing the 235 tires. The first 200 miles were in 4wd because of snow, so it was hardly a fair test. Still, the truck feels lighter with the smaller tires. I 'll wait for a fair test when warmer weather arrives.
__________________

__________________
Capitalism: The cream rises. Socialism: The scum rises.
Sludgy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Feature: Loan and lease cost labrie Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 02-08-2012 01:12 AM
More fun on FUELLY brytrkr1 Fuelly Web Support and Community News 3 12-06-2009 10:41 PM
Basic Stats poorboymeyer Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 09-22-2009 08:19 AM
drivetrain resistance bagpipe goatee General Fuel Topics 9 09-14-2008 09:04 PM
MetroXFi changed his name! SVOboy General Discussion (Off-Topic) 26 04-09-2006 06:38 PM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.